Heat Exchanger Tube Inspection Singapore — IRIS, Eddy Current & Tube-Bundle NDT

Internal NDT of shell-and-tube exchangers, condensers, air coolers and boiler bundles. We match the technique to the tube material — IRIS ultrasonic, eddy current (ECT), RFT, NFT and MFL — to measure wall loss, find pitting and cracking, and give you a clear tubesheet map with plug-or-retube decisions in time for your turnaround.

What Is Heat Exchanger Tube Inspection?

Heat exchanger tube inspection is the internal non-destructive testing (NDT) of the tube bundle inside a shell-and-tube exchanger, condenser, air cooler or boiler — reading the condition of the metal from inside each individual tube. A probe is fed from the tubesheet face down the bore of the tube, measuring or sensing wall loss, pitting, cracking and other defects along its full length. It is a fundamentally different job from an external drone visual inspection of the exchanger shell: the shell survey looks at the pressure envelope, nozzles, supports and lagging from outside, while tube inspection interrogates the hundreds or thousands of thin-walled tubes that actually do the heat transfer and most often fail first.

The reason tube inspection is a specialised discipline is that no single technique suits every tube. Exchanger tubes are made from copper alloys, admiralty brass, titanium, stainless steel, carbon steel and duplex, and the physics of each NDT method depends on whether the tube is ferromagnetic or not. A competent tube-bundle inspection therefore begins with selecting the right method — or combination of methods — for the material in front of us, then applying it consistently across the whole bundle so the results can be compared tube to tube and turnaround to turnaround.

Because the work is internal, it can only be done with the exchanger opened, isolated and the tubes hydro-jetted clean. That places tube inspection firmly inside the plant turnaround or shutdown window, alongside the other fixed-equipment inspection scopes on the critical path.

Why Tube Integrity Matters

Exchanger tubes are the thinnest-walled pressure components in most process units, and they live in the harshest position — carrying corrosive process fluids or cooling water at temperature, cycle after cycle. They deteriorate through several well-known mechanisms: general and localised corrosion, flow-accelerated erosion at the tube inlets, pitting under deposits, under-deposit corrosion, stress-corrosion cracking in susceptible alloys, and mechanical wear where tubes rub against baffles. Any of these can perforate a tube wall that started only a millimetre or two thick.

When a tube leaks, the consequences reach well beyond the exchanger. Cross-contamination between the shell and tube sides can push cooling water into a hydrocarbon stream or vice versa, upsetting downstream units and corroding other equipment. A single failed tube in a critical service can force an unplanned shutdown of an entire train — the exact outcome a turnaround is meant to prevent for the next run length. On Jurong Island's refineries and petrochemical plants, where units are expected to run four to six years between turnarounds, knowing the true condition of every bundle is central to setting a defensible run length.

The practical question a turnaround team must answer is simple to state and hard to answer without data: which tubes are fit to run, which must be plugged now, and is the bundle close enough to end-of-life that it should be retubed or replaced? Tube-bundle NDT exists to convert a wall of unknown tubes into a graded, evidence-backed answer to that question.

Tube NDT Methods — and When We Use Each

The value of a tube inspection lies in matching the method to the tube. We select from the established family of internal NDT techniques and, where speed and accuracy pull in different directions, combine them in a sampling strategy.

Method Best For What It Gives You
IRIS (Internal Rotary Inspection System) Ferrous and non-ferrous tubes where absolute wall data is needed Ultrasonic, quantitative remaining wall thickness around the full circumference. Accurate but slower, and needs thoroughly cleaned tubes.
ECT (Eddy Current Testing) Thin non-ferromagnetic tubes — copper, brass, admiralty, titanium, austenitic stainless Fast electromagnetic screening for pitting, wall loss and cracking across the whole bundle. Comparative rather than an absolute thickness gauge.
RFT (Remote-Field Testing) Ferromagnetic carbon-steel and duplex tubes Detects volumetric wall loss in tubes that conventional ECT cannot read reliably.
NFT (Near-Field Testing) Carbon-steel fin-fan air-cooler tubes Sensitive to internal pitting and inlet-region erosion in ferromagnetic air-cooler bundles.
MFL (Magnetic Flux Leakage) Ferromagnetic tubes, rapid screening for sharp defects Fast detection of pitting and localised metal loss, often paired with IRIS for sizing.

In practice a bundle is often screened quickly with the appropriate electromagnetic method (ECT for non-ferrous, RFT/NFT/MFL for ferromagnetic) to find where the damage is concentrated, then IRIS is applied on a targeted sample and on any suspect tubes to put a quantitative wall-thickness number against the indications. This sampling strategy balances coverage against the slower, more precise IRIS scan, and keeps the inspection inside the turnaround window without sacrificing confidence in the plug/retube call.

What We Inspect For

Every tube is assessed against the damage mechanisms that actually take exchanger tubes out of service, and each indication is located to a specific tube on the tubesheet.

Tube Wall Loss & Pitting

General thinning, flow-accelerated erosion at inlets and localised under-deposit pitting — quantified so remaining wall can be tracked against the plugging limit.

Cracking & Defects

Stress-corrosion cracking, baffle-wear grooving, and manufacturing or handling defects that conventional visual checks cannot see inside the bore.

Full-Bundle Mapping

Findings plotted on a tubesheet grid so wall-loss patterns — inlet-end erosion, bottom-row deposits, baffle-lane wear — become visible across the whole bundle.

Plug / Retube Recommendation

Tubes graded to plug now, watch, or replace, giving a clear basis for the plug-versus-retube decision and the associated spares planning.

Where Tube Inspection Fits

Tube-bundle NDT applies to the full population of tubed equipment on a process site: shell-and-tube heat exchangers, overhead and surface condensers, fin-fan air coolers, and fire-tube and water-tube boilers. On Jurong Island refineries and petrochemical plants these run in cooling-water, hydrocarbon, amine, sour-water and steam services, each with its own dominant damage mechanism that steers the method choice.

The work is scheduled into the plant turnaround because the exchanger has to be isolated, opened and the tubes cleaned before any probe can pass. Sequencing matters: because the plug-versus-retube outcome drives long-lead spares and re-tube labour, tube inspection is planned early in the shutdown so the reliability team has answers while the bundle is still accessible. It pairs naturally with the external drone exchanger inspection of the shell and with the wider oil and gas inspection and industrial inspection scopes we deliver across a unit.

Standards We Work To

Tube-bundle NDT is governed by recognised codes and industry practice, and we plan and report our work to align with them. Ultrasonic and eddy current examination follow ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section V, which sets out the requirements for those methods. IRIS ultrasonic tube examination is described in ASTM E2096. The condition assessment sits within the pressure-vessel and heat-exchanger inspection framework of API 510 and the inspection practices of API 572, while eddy-current tubing practice for condensers and heat exchangers draws on established EPRI guidance. Acceptance and plugging criteria are always agreed with your inspection or fixed-equipment engineer before we start, so the grading reflects your fitness-for-service basis for the equipment.

Why Choose SG Drone Inspections

We deliver tube-bundle NDT as part of a full turnaround inspection capability, so the tube data lands in the same coordinated package as the rest of your exchanger and unit scope.

Right Technique Per Tube Material

We select IRIS, ECT, RFT, NFT or MFL by tube alloy and expected damage mechanism — not a one-size-fits-all probe — so the results are valid for your bundle.

Quantitative Wall Thickness

IRIS ultrasonic gives actual remaining-wall figures in millimetres, so plugging decisions rest on measured metal loss rather than a comparative signal alone.

Turnaround-Scheduled

We plan the tube scope early in the shutdown and work to the bundle's window on the critical path, so plug/retube answers arrive while rectification is still possible.

Clear Tube Map

Findings are delivered as a graded tubesheet map with a plug or retube recommendation and trend data your engineers can carry into the next turnaround.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you inspect heat exchanger tubes internally?
A probe is fed down each cleaned tube from the tubesheet face. The method is matched to the tube material — IRIS ultrasonic for quantitative wall thickness, ECT for thin non-ferrous tubes, and RFT/NFT/MFL for ferromagnetic carbon-steel tubes. This inspects the tubes themselves, which is distinct from external drone visual inspection of the exchanger shell.
What is IRIS versus eddy current testing?
IRIS is an ultrasonic method that measures actual remaining wall thickness around the full circumference of each tube and works on both ferrous and non-ferrous tubes, but it is slower and needs clean tubes. ECT is a fast electromagnetic method, excellent at finding pitting and cracks in thin non-ferromagnetic tubes, but comparative rather than an absolute thickness gauge. Bundles are often screened with ECT and verified with IRIS on a sample.
Which method suits my tube material?
Non-ferromagnetic tubes (copper, brass, admiralty, titanium, austenitic stainless) suit ECT, with IRIS for wall-thickness verification. Ferromagnetic carbon-steel and duplex tubes need RFT, NFT or MFL, since conventional ECT cannot read them reliably. We confirm the alloy and expected damage mechanism before selecting the method.
Can you tell me which tubes to plug?
Yes. Each tube is graded against a wall-loss or fitness-for-service limit agreed with your inspection engineer. Tubes below the plugging threshold are flagged on a tubesheet map, separated into plug-now, watch, and end-of-life groups, giving a clear plug or retube recommendation for the turnaround.
Is this done during a turnaround?
Almost always. The exchanger must be isolated, opened and the tubes hydro-jetted clean before any probe can pass, which only happens during a shutdown. Because the plug-versus-retube decision drives long-lead spares, tube inspection is planned early in the turnaround so results are available while the bundle is still open.

Get a Tube Inspection Scope & Quote

Send us the exchanger tag, tube material, count and length, and your turnaround dates. We reply with a recommended method and scope within 24 hours — no obligation.